Reduce rereading
Notes preserve what happened in class. Flashcards create a retrieval task, so you practice producing the important idea rather than repeatedly recognizing the same page.
Paste a short section or upload the document you already use for class. Repeto identifies ideas worth retrieving, proposes focused cards, and lets you edit the batch before any answer enters your review queue.
Free to start · review free forever · no card details required
Two genetically identical daughter cells.
One testable idea from the note—not a copied paragraph.
Select the ideas you will need to recall, rewrite each as one clear prompt, keep the answer short enough to grade, and add context only when it removes ambiguity. Repeto automates the first draft from pasted notes or documents, while leaving you responsible for checking facts, removing weak cards, and choosing what deserves repeated study.
Start with one topic, lecture, or heading instead of dumping an entire semester into a generator. Smaller sources make it easier to judge coverage and remove low-value details.
Add the notes to the correct deck. Repeto uses the source and deck instructions to propose definitions, questions, contrasts, formulas, or vocabulary cards.
Delete cards that merely restate headings, split questions with several answers, verify claims against the notes, and add missing context when two answers could both be reasonable.
Answer each approved card without looking at the notes, then rate the result. FSRS schedules the next review based on your history with that card.
Notes preserve what happened in class. Flashcards create a retrieval task, so you practice producing the important idea rather than repeatedly recognizing the same page.
Generate from the material you were actually assigned and use the source to verify technical language, dates, examples, equations, and exceptions.
Approving fewer high-value cards prevents the notes from turning into hundreds of future reviews that compete with problems, writing, and deeper practice.
Good conversion is selective. The goal is not to preserve every sentence but to create prompts that strengthen the knowledge you will use again.
Cards are effective for terminology, steps, formulas, cause-and-effect links, classifications, and contrasts that have a reasonably clear answer. These prompts can be recalled and graded in a short review.
An essay claim, proof, case analysis, or multi-stage calculation should not be compressed until it becomes misleading. Use cards for the component facts or decision points, then practise the complete problem separately.
A note heading such as “cellular respiration” is too broad. Ask for a specific location, input, output, purpose, stage, or contrast. A narrow prompt makes both recall and self-grading more reliable.
A generated batch can feel productive because the count rises quickly. Each accepted card will return, so remove duplicates and trivia before they begin consuming review time. Coverage matters less than a queue you can finish consistently.
Automation should remove repetitive drafting while preserving the decisions that determine whether a card is accurate and worth reviewing.
Yes. Photograph a clear notebook page and add the image as source material. Handwriting recognition is imperfect, so verify every extracted name, number, formula, and technical term before approving the cards.
There is no fixed ratio. Keep the cards that test important, reusable knowledge and fit your available review time. Start with a small section, study the batch, and adjust based on the reviews you can complete consistently.
Usually no. Copying produces long, passive cards. Rewrite the material as focused prompts with concise answers, and retain only enough context to make the expected answer unambiguous.
Yes. Approve and edit the cards in Repeto, then export the deck as an Anki-compatible .apkg file.